Athletic director Steve Pederson said today that Pitt will host as many games as possible in the College Basketball Invitational.
Pitt (17-16), shutout from the NCAA Tournament and the NIT after a disappointing 13th-place finish in the Big East, will play host to Wofford (19-13) on Wednesday night at Petersen Events Center.
With a win, Pitt would host the Princeton-at-Evansville winner on March 19 in the quarterfinals. The teams are re-seeded after the quarterfinals with the higher seed hosting the semifinal.
'As long as we keep winning, we will keep hosting the games,' Pederson said.
The cost to host a first-round game is reported to be $35,000, though Pederson declined to confirm that figure.
Pederson, who held a teleconference this afternoon, said accepting a bid to the 16-team CBI was the plan if the Panthers didn`t get into the NIT.
'It was an easy decision and one that we made some time ago,' he said.
As for ticket sales • the first-round average in the CBI last year was 2,414 • Pederson said the 'phones have been busy.'
'We already have been pleased with the ticket sales and the response we`ve gotten,' he said. 'We feel pretty good about being able to cover the cost of hosting the tournament here.'
Pederson, who said he was surprised, but 'not shocked" that Pitt missed the 32-team NIT field, said the CBI will provide a positive opportunity for the youthful Panthers.
'We`re doing this because it`s important to Jamie and the players,' he said. 'This was the right things to do. Overall, it will be good competition for our players. We`ve enjoyed so many fabulous years and this is just a little bit different for us. There are a lot of advantages.'
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.