NBC analyst Milbury apologizes to Penguins for comments
BOSTON — NBC analyst Mike Milbury apologized to the Penguins.
Center Sidney Crosby still didn't seem enamored with Milbury, whose comments to a Philadelphia radio station blasted Crosby and Penguins coach Dan Bylsma.
"I don't want to get into that," Crosby said.
Then, he did.
"I don't know what he's looking for, if he's looking for attention," Crosby said. "I don't know what it is. I really don't know where that came from."
Milbury, who mocked Crosby's concussion problems, said Crosby was a "goody-two-shoes" and that Crosby has a "little bit of punk" in his game, did not mention the 24-year-old superstar in his public apology but did speak with Penguins president David Morehouse.
In a statement, Milbury said: "I reached out to David Morehouse and the Penguins about the comments I made (Tuesday) on Philadelphia radio. In hindsight, I realize what I said was inappropriate and wrong, and I want to apologize the Penguins organization and their fans."
Crosby made his most scathing comments about Milbury following Tuesday's morning skate.
"You can really twist something a certain way, and he's obviously shown that he's more than capable of doing that," Crosby said. "He's pretty good at twisting things around, that's for sure."
Crosby took a subtle shot at Milbury's reference to Crosby not being a "perfect gentleman" on the ice.
"As far as me slashing someone," Crosby said, "I guess I'm not a gentleman on the ice sometimes. It's a contact sport."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.