Steelers court free safety Crocker
As quiet as the Steelers have been during free agency, one thing that has become apparent since the signing period started a week ago is that their intent on improving at free safety.
The team hosted free agent Chris Crocker on Thursday, marking the second visit this week by a prospective free safety (Eugene Wilson met with the Steelers on Tuesday).
Crocker, who has also visited the Texans, said he was impressed by what he saw and heard from the Steelers. Of meetings he has scheduled with the Broncos and Titans, the fifth-year veteran said, "Let's hope I don't have to make those trips."
Crocker had a career-high three interceptions for the Falcons last season and made 55 tackles. The 5-foot-11 192-pounder played three years for the Browns, who took him in the third round of the 2003 draft, before being traded to Atlanta.
The Steelers had problems at free safety last season.
Starter Ryan Clark was lost in October because of a condition that eventually led to the removal of his spleen. Anthony Smith, who replaced Clark, floundered late in the season and lost his starting job to Tyrone Carter.
Crocker said the Steelers told him he'd have a chance to compete for the starting job at free safety if the two sides reached an agreement.
"(The Steelers) are very high on my list, but they have to make it easy," Crocker said. "It still is a business, but it's also about winning. The ball is in their court right now."
Note: Second-year defensive end Ryan McBean hurt his right foot and is on crutches. The injury happened recently, though Peter Schaffer, McBean's agent, declined to comment on the nature or severity of it. Schaffer, via e-mail, said he didn't want to comment before team doctors had a chance to examine McBean's foot.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers’ Taylor ‘hurt’ by pay cut
- Ex-player’s book details Steeler havens across country
- Veteran receiver Moore making seamless transition with Steelers
- Under Noll, Steelers enjoyed unparalleled success
- Steelers’ Polamalu gets on field for 1st time with Mitchell at minicamp
- Steelers notebook: Tomlin relents, gives players slight respite
- Kovacevic: Steelers’ offensive identity, anyone?