The Steelers added more depth to their defensive line Thursday when they re-signed Nick Eason to a two-year contract.
Eason, who had been an unrestricted free agent, played in 17 games (including playoffs) for the Steelers last season, his first with the team, and started one game in place of the injured Aaron Smith at left defensive end.
The 6-foot-5, 305-pounder was credited with seven tackles in 2007.
The re-signing of Eason means the Steelers will open training camp with all seven of the defensive linemen that played for them last season.
What it means for Anthony "Booger" McFarland is anybody's guess.
The Steelers' interest in the veteran defensive tackle has apparently not gone beyond the visit he made to the team's South Side practice facility Tuesday. The two sides have yet to engage in contract negotiations.
In other Steelers news, the team hosted five college prospects Thursday, including Boston College offensive tackle Gosder Cherilus, who has been projected as a first- or second-round pick.
Also meeting with the Steelers coaches were Texas A&M defensive tackle Joseph "Red" Bryant, Michigan State running back Jehuu Caulcrick, Hampton defensive end Kendall Langford and Kansas fullback Brandon McAnderson.
The 6-6, 314-pound Cherilus started for three years at right tackle for Boston College before moving over to the left side his senior season.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.