Steelers face unanswered questions at camp
Steelers coach Mike Tomlin did not try to temper his excitement for the start of the team's 42nd training camp at St. Vincent College near Latrobe.
"I love the process of team building," said Tomlin, who guided the Steelers to a 10-6 record and an AFC North title last year, his first season. "I love going to camp."
The Steelers must answer several questions before they break camp Aug. 18:
• Can the players ignore the potential distraction of team Chairman Dan Rooney's effort to gain controlling interest in the team as his four brothers ponder selling their shares to an outside buyer• Each of the five Rooney brothers owns 16 percent of the team.
"They said that it's family business, Rooney business, so I'll let them handle that," Tomlin said. "The task that's before me is to prepare this team to play football, and that's what I intend to do."
• How will Tomlin respond to the pressure of a second season while playing the NFL's toughest schedule• Eight of the team's 13 opponents made the playoffs last season.
• Will the offensive line that allowed 47 sacks during the regular season improve• The Steelers start camp with Chris Kemoeatu replacing Pro Bowl left guard Alan Faneca, who left for the New York Jets via free agency. Max Starks and Willie Colon fight for the job at right tackle while free agent center Justin Hartwig attempts to unseat starter Sean Mahan.
The Steelers will trim their stay at St. Vincent to three weeks due in part to smaller roster sizes and Tomlin's familiarity with the players in his second year. The NFL has limited teams to 80 players in camp, down from 86 last year.
"Not to say that it will be easy," Tomlin said of training camp. "It will never be easy, but it will be different."
Steelers training camp
Click here to view an interactive map of the Steelers training camp facility at St. Vincent College.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.