Steelers now worth more than $1 billion, Forbes says
The Steelers are a billion-dollar business.
In its annual study of the value of the NFL's 32 franchises, Forbes on Wednesday pegged the Steelers' worth at $1.01 billion, 18th highest in the league. A year ago, the team's value was $928 million.
Four of the Rooney brothers, each of whom owns a 16 percent share of the team, are looking to sell. A fifth brother, Chairman Dan Rooney, is trying to buy enough shares to keep the team in the family.
The franchise was founded by their father, Art Rooney Sr.
Dan Rooney offered his four brothers -- Art Jr., Tim, Pat and John -- $700 million for their shares.
The four brothers had the franchise appraised last year by Goldman Sachs & Co. of New York, which estimated the team was worth between $800 million and $1.2 billion.
Team officials and representatives of Goldman Sachs declined to comment on the Forbes study.
The value of the franchise has skyrocketed in the past decade. Public records show that the Steelers were valued at $173 million in 1997. In 2003 -- two years after Heinz Field opened, the franchise's value increased to $608 million.
With a value of $1.6 billion, the Dallas Cowboys are the No. 1 franchise in the NFL, according to Forbes. Second on the list is the Washington Redskins at $1.5 billion, followed by the New England Patriots at $1.3 billion.
The study pegs the Steelers' 2008 revenues at $216 million and their operating income at $14.4 million. The value of the franchise rose 9 percent in the past year.
Scott Brown can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org . Joe Starkey can be reached at email@example.com or 412-320-7810.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.