Big Ben's lawyer: Accuser's e-mails undermine case
An attorney for Ben Roethlisberger released a series of e-mails Tuesday that he contends undermine the civil rape allegation brought by a Nevada casino worker against the Steelers quarterback.
"We believe that (the woman's) own words directly refute the scurrilous allegations made in her complaint," said a statement from attorney David Cornwell of Atlanta, who represents Roethlisberger. "(She) should abandon her lawsuit immediately and admit that Ben Roethlisberger did not rape her."
The woman claims Roethlisberger sexually assaulted her July 11, 2008, at the Harrah's Lake Tahoe Hotel and Casino, where she worked as a VIP concierge. She filed a civil lawsuit in Reno last month, two weeks before the Super Bowl champions opened training camp.
Roethlisberger, 27, has denied assaulting the 31-year-old woman, who has never gone to police.
The Tribune-Review doesn't name alleged victims of sexual assault.
Cornwell's statement doesn't say how the e-mails, which couldn't be readily verified, were obtained.
The e-mails are purportedly between the woman and a fictitious online boyfriend fabricated by the angry wife of a former paramour.
According to Cornwell, a day after the alleged assault, the casino worker sent an e-mail stating she has been "chosen to take care of all the Penthouse guests...Michael Jordan, Ben Roethlisberger (we all think he looks like you), Donald Trump, Tony Romo and Jessica Simpson..."
Roethlisberger, Jordan and the others were at Lake Tahoe attending the 2008 American Century Championship golf tournament.
The following day, Cornwell said, she sent an e-mail stating she was looking forward to having dinner with Roethlisberger: "This golf tournament has been really fun...Speaking of which, I need to head over to dinner with your lookalike and a few others..."
According to Cornwell, the woman wrote a third e-mail several months later saying, "I would date Ben Roethlisberger" if the opportunity arose.
Her attorney, Calvin Dunlap of Reno, didn't return calls seeking comment.
Roethlisberger's attorneys have until Friday to file a response to the woman's allegations.
In a court filing made public yesterday, a former best friend and co-worker of the woman asked a judge to dismiss separate claims against her in the Roethlisberger lawsuit.
The suit accuses Stacy Dingman, who worked as director of hotel operations, and seven other Harrah's employees of conspiring in a cover-up and spreading false information.
Dingman's lawyers argue the lawsuit failed to make any factual allegations against their client and "has unjustifiably dragged Dingman ... into this baseless lawsuit."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.