Clark not likely to play
• Ryan Clark practiced again Friday, but the Steelers' free safety is unlikely to suit up Monday night against the Broncos due to the life-threatening complications he suffered the last time he played in Denver. If Clark doesn't play in the nationally televised game, Tyrone Carter will start in his place. Clark's blood sickled two seasons ago due to his rare form of sickle-cell trait and the high altitude in Denver. He later had to have his spleen and gall bladder removed in separate operations. "Same exact answer," Clark said of his playing status following practice. "Ya'll will know when everybody else knows Monday night. Everybody will find out together."
• Defensive end Travis Kirschke (calf strain) missed practice again. Inside linebacker Lawrence Timmons (ankle sprain) returned to practice but was limited. Timmons said in a recent post on his blog that he is "day to day."
â€¢ Denver defensive end Ryan McBean, who has started every game this season, missed his third consecutive praactice because of a knee injury he suffered against Baltimore last week. McBean, the Steelers' fourth-round draft pick in 2007 who has 11 tackles this season, will be replaced by LeKevin Smith.
• ESPN Monday Night Football analyst Jon Gruden predicts a defensive struggle between the Steelers and Broncos, with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger being the difference-maker. "To me, that guy always finds a way in big games to deliver," Gruden said. "I realize the Steelers have had some injuries, but I'm so impressed with Roethlisberger in big games. I think it's going to come down to Big Ben in crunch time."
1 -- Steelers' wins in Denver since 1978 (2005 AFC Championship Game).
4 -- Steelers' consecutive wins on Monday Night Football.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.