ShareThis Page

Starkey: Fast Willie's future clouded

| Saturday, Nov. 7, 2009

Willie Parker carried the ball 50 times in the first two games of the 2007 season, prompting somebody to ask first-year Steelers coach Mike Tomlin if he planned to continue riding Parker so hard.

Tomlin replied that he would "ride Willie until the wheels come off."

Earlier this week, I reminded Parker of that quote. He managed a smile but quickly turned serious.

"That year," Parker said, "he did run me a little too much."

Too much?

"I think I was leading the league in carries that year," Parker said. "I don't think that was smart of us as an offensive unit. You can look back at it, and I guess we would change some things. But it is what it is. It's about now."

Actually, offensive coordinator Bruce Arians wouldn't change a thing. After tying for fifth in the league in attempts with 337 in 2006, Parker was first in attempts (nearly 23 per game) and yards going into the 15th game of '07, at St. Louis, when he suffered a broken leg on his first carry.

"No, I wouldn't change anything," Arians said. "He was going strong, Pro Bowl. I'd take back that play he broke his leg on; that'd be the only thing. And I don't think these current injuries have anything to do with that year."

I tend to agree with Arians. Parker had a normal workload for a premier back. He was barely involved in the passing game, and Najeh Davenport took five carries a game, too.

When the Steelers signed Parker to a four-year, $13.6 million contract in September of 2006 - after only one full season - it wasn't to split a workload. They signed him to ride him, and Parker responded with two more terrific years before the fluke leg injury, when his foot caught in the turf at the Edward Jones Dome.

That proved to be the first in a string of injuries, the latest being turf toe.

The reality now is that Parker will turn 29 Wednesday, and, like many backs his age, has begun to slow down. Would four fewer carries per game have prevented the erosion?

Look around the league. Of the top 10 rushers, only one (Thomas Jones) is older than 27.

Look at history. Of the 250 rushing seasons of at least 1,200 yards, only 20 were posted by running backs 30-or-older.

It just happens. The arc of Parker's career is graphically reflected in his annual yards-per-carry average, starting with a limited-action first season:







Two months ago, Tomlin said: "Willie is our runner." Today, Parker is Rashard Mendenhall's backup. That's how fast things happen in the NFL.

In five short years, the good-natured Parker has gone from long shot to big shot to looking for his next shot. He's even starting to sound old.

"You know how it is, football, it's a young man's sport," Parker said, when asked to consider his rapidly changing fortunes. "You gotta be healthy to play this game. I've been having little nicks here and there."

This doesn't necessarily mean we've seen the last of Fast Willie. He might still help the Steelers. He is capable of a pinch-hit homer, even if he hasn't had a run longer than 34 yards since late in '06.

We could see flashes of the old Parker from time to time, but I doubt if we'll ever see it again from game to game. The Steelers have shown no interest in re-signing him after the season. It's hard to imagine anyone offering big money to a beat-up runner who will turn 30 next season.

Parker insists he isn't thinking ahead.

"One thing I do is wake up and pray in the morning and live my life right now," he said. "I just worry about the present."

Funny thing about Parker: He is the third-most prolific runner in franchise history (behind Franco Harris and Jerome Bettis) and the only one to post three consecutive years of 1,200 yards or better, yet nobody ever seemed to consider him among the NFL's elite.

Nobody but the Steelers, that is.

Why do you think they gave him the ball so much?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.