ShareThis Page

Chief concern: Steelers stumble, fall in K.C.

| Monday, Nov. 23, 2009

KANSAS CITY — Following perhaps the most unexpected loss of the Mike Tomlin era, a come-from-ahead defeat against a team that had not won at home this season until Sunday, Steelers nose tackle Casey Hampton said what had to be going through every mind in a hushed and cramped visiting locker room.

"There was no doubt in my mind we were going to win," Hampton said.

The Steelers didn't just drop a 27-24 overtime stunner to the Kansas City Chiefs yesterday. They also lost Ben Roethlisberger on the first possession of overtime when the franchise quarterback took a knee to the head.

Roethlisberger likely wouldn't have returned even if the defense hadn't given up a 61-yard reception to Chris Chambers. The catch-and-run set up a 22-yard game-winning field goal by Ryan Succop.

The Steelers squandered a 10-point halftime lead and lost despite outgaining the Chiefs by more than 200 yards.

After failing several times to put away the Chiefs (3-7), the Steelers find themselves at a crossroads.

They are 6-4 with a trip to Baltimore looming on the schedule, and their margin for error for reaching the playoffs has shrunk considerably over the past two weeks.

If the Steelers miss the postseason, as they did the last time they were defending Super Bowl champions, they will look back on the Chiefs' game with supreme regret.

"There were many opportunities to secure the outcome of that football game, whether it was in overtime or regulation," Tomlin said after the Steelers lost consecutive games for the second time this season. "We didn't. They did."

The game had a little bit of everything, including the expected — the Steelers gave up a kickoff return for a touchdown for the fourth time in five games — and the unexpected. That included a dropped pass by the normally sure-handed Heath Miller on the Steelers' first possession of the second half.

It resulted in a game-changing interception by Andy Studebaker, a Division III Wheaton (Ill.) College product who had two picks in his first NFL start.

Yet, even after that special teams breakdown and two Roethlisberger interceptions in the second half, the Steelers looked like they were going to escape Kansas City with a victory.

Then, the defense decided it also wanted to assist on Kansas City's first win in 2009 at venerable Arrowhead Stadium.

The Steelers allowed the Chiefs to drive 91 yards on eight plays in the fourth quarter and tie the score, 24-24. In overtime, they yielded the longest pass play of the game on a short crossing pattern to Chambers.

It came after Ike Taylor almost intercepted a deep Matt Cassel pass — and after the Chiefs went to a no-huddle approach.

The element of surprise worked as the Steelers were confused following the defensive call that came late from the sidelines.

They also missed several tackles after Chambers caught the third-and-5 pass and wasn't taken down until he was close enough for the Chiefs to win the game with a Succop chip shot.

Perhaps outside linebacker James Harrison summed up the loss best when he said, "We had some mental lapses on defenses, too many turnovers and we started off fighting an uphill battle."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.