Tomlin shakeup doesn't emerge in Cleveland
CLEVELAND — The shakeup that coach Mike Tomlin said might be coming after the Steelers lost their fourth consecutive game didn't happen Thursday night in Cleveland. No changes were made to the starting lineup and two regulars — wide receiver Hines Ward (hamstring) and cornerback William Gay (head) — played despite sustaining injuries last Sunday.
Perhaps the biggest surprise among the Steelers inactives last night was cornerback Keenan Lewis. Tomlin said earlier this week that the Steelers wanted to take a long look at Lewis and fellow rookie Joe Burnett.
While Gay started, Burnett came in on the second series at the cornerback spot opposite Ike Taylor. That was the only series he played in place of Gay in the first half.
In a minor change, Mewelde Moore and Stefan Logan each returned punts and kickoffs last night. Lewis may have been caught in a numbers crunch.
» With Ward's hamstring a concern, the Steelers dressed five wide receivers for the first time this season. Tyler Grisham, who was signed from the practice squad last Wednesday served as the Steelers' No. 4 wide receiver, ahead of Limas Sweed.
» In addition to Lewis, strong safety Troy Polamalu (knee), defensive end Nick Eason, fullback Carey Davis, guard Kraig Urbik, offensive tackle Tony Hills, defensive end Sunny Harris and quarterback Charlie Batch were inactive.
» Santonio Holmes went over the 1,000-yard receiving mark for the season last night. It is the first time at any level that Holmes has eclipsed the 1,000-yard receiving mark ... Ward has caught at least one pass in 175 consecutive regular-season games, which is a team record ... Ray Ventrone, a Chartiers Valley High graduate, left the game in the first half with a hand injury. The Scott native is one of the Browns' top special teams' players.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.