ShareThis Page

Committee to hold 2nd concussion hearing

| Friday, Dec. 18, 2009

WASHINGTON — After seeing the NFL make changes to its concussion policy since an October hearing, Congress wants to know whether the league is doing enough — and where things stand in college and high school football.

The House Judiciary Committee will hold a session called "Legal Issues Relating to Football Head Injuries, Part II" on Jan. 4 in Detroit.

"We discussed the hearing with committee staff as recently as today concerning information they may need from us," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello wrote Thursday in an e-mail to The Associated Press.

On Oct. 28 in Washington, lawmakers questioned NFL commissioner Roger Goodell about the league's approach to concussions and grilled him on whether head injuries in football can be linked to brain disease. Since then, Goodell has announced stricter return-to-play guidelines that make it tougher for players to get back on the field after head injuries and has made every team enlist an independent neurologist who can be consulted when players have concussions.

Neither Goodell nor any other NFL employee was on the preliminary witness list released Thursday by the office of committee chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., although Aiello wrote that the league "will be able to tell the committee soon whether we will have a witness attend."

Among those who were on the witness list: neurologist Ira Casson. He did not appear at the October hearing — lawmakers had hoped he would — and recently resigned as co-chairman of the NFL's concussion committee.

"It will be good opportunity for Dr. Casson to set the record straight on his views," Aiello wrote.

Casson did not immediately respond to a message left at his office requesting comment.

At the October hearing, Rep. Linda Sanchez, D-Calif., played a clip of a TV interview in which Casson denied evidence of a link between multiple head injuries in NFL players and brain disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer's. Sanchez said that reminded her of tobacco companies denying a link between smoking and health damage in the 1990s.

Among others slated to appear next month at Wayne State University, which is in Conyers' congressional district: NFL Players Association executive director DeMaurice Smith, NCAA director of health and safety David Klossner, and Wayne State assistant professor of neurology Randall Benson.

An NCAA committee recommended this week a new rule that would sideline an athlete for at least the rest of the day if he or she loses consciousness or shows other worrisome symptoms during competition. The rule would apply to all NCAA sports.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.