Bradshaw to Ben: Fight the temptation
Steelers Hall of Fame quarterback Terry Bradshaw sounded off on Ben Roethlisberger yesterday, hours after authorities announced they wouldn't file charges against Roethlisberger.
"He has got to realize who he is," Bradshaw said, speaking at the annual Bradshaw-Brooks Golf Tournament at Squire Creek Country Club in Louisiana. "He is an elite athlete in the National Football League. He's got an image problem right now. Best thing to do is never put yourself in that position again."
Not that Bradshaw expects Roethlisberger to listen.
"Our relationship is not any good," Bradshaw said. "When I told him to park the motorcycle, he got (peeved). Then he had the accident, and since then he doesn't like me, and I'm learning not to like him."
The outspoken Bradshaw has been a football analyst on Fox for years.
"There's nothing greater if you're single than to walk into a bar with beautiful women and have them just fill your ego up," he said. "And you ask yourself, 'Would they pay any attention to you if you weren't who you are?' Of course not. I'm not that attractive, and neither is Ben.
"The perception is if Ben has had two of these, there's got to be some guilt there somewhere. That's the perception, right or wrong. The only way you can clean that up is you've got to stay out of it. Fight the temptation and stay away from those places. Once would scare me to death. Twice• I don't even know how you sleep."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.