Analysis: Tomlin mishandled Steelers' quarterback situation
First of all, there was no blueprint on how to handle the quarterback dilemma that Mike Tomlin was faced with over the past few months.
Now that Tomlin has fashioned one on what to do when your franchise quarterback is suspended for the first four games of the regular season because he violated the NFL's personal conduct policy, any coach who faces that quandary in the future should definitely reference's Tomlin's blueprint.
Well, they should reference it as what not do to.
Let's face it: Tomlin did a wonderful job through minicamp, OTAs and training camp on handling his four quarterbacks.
He had a solid plan in place and was following it step-for-step.
Byron Leftwich was the man getting the most snaps with the first team, while giving Ben Roethlisberger with enough work to keep him sharp. Dennis Dixon was learning on he fly, and Charlie Batch was sitting in the background as an insurance policy.
Perfect plan and perfect execution.
That is, until Dixon completed a couple of passes against the third- and fourth-team defenses during the first two preseason games, prompting Tomlin to shove that blueprint to the side.
It's been all downhill from there.
Every move Tomlin has made with his quarterbacks since the preseason game against the Giants has been wrong.
Dixon got first-team snaps and started against the Broncos - wrong decision.
Leftwich, the presumed starter in Week 1, played the final preseason game and ended up getting hurt - wrong decision.
Dixon was named the starter over Batch — another bad decision — even though it was evident that what Tomlin was going to ask Dixon to do was something that Batch does better and has done many more times.
At least Tomlin decided to start a healthy Batch over a banged-up Leftwich, although he really didn't have any other viable options.
We'll see if Tomlin continues his streak of good decisions by letting Batch do something more than hand off the ball off and throw some ultra-conservative passes.
I doubt it.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.