Panthers rookie Clausen learning the hard way
Carolina coach John Fox never had the intentions of playing rookie quarterback Jimmy Clausen this year.
But an injury to Matt More altered that plan.
Clausen has started eight games completing 128 of 243 passes for 1,304 yards, two touchdowns and eight interceptions.
Even though the numbers aren't good, Fox is happy with the rookie's progress.
"We had a bit of a setback two weeks ago," Fox said. "Like all young players, they are going to make some mistakes. About this past week, Jimmy had made some much better decisions; I thought he operated the offense as well as he has so far. This was his first win as a starting quarterback and he was very excited, and not afraid to work at it."
Against the Falcons two weeks ago, Clausen had a 51.9 passer rating, but rebounded by leading the Panthers to a victory over Arizona last week.
• Carolina is 2-12 and has the worst record in the league.
Even so, the Steelers can't fall into that trap like they did last year when they went to Cleveland late in the season on a Thursday night and lost to a bad Browns team.
"We have to be ready to play," quarterback Ben Roethlisberger said. "Truly, nobody is ever as bad as their record in this league. They are going to come out and give us a fight."
• Fox has been coaching in the NFL for 21 years. First as an assistant under Chuck Noll with the Steelers, and the past nine years as Carolina head coach.
"Being 2-12 is unchartered territory for me," Fox said. "I've never had a bottomed-out season in 21 years, so this has been my first. I'm not an expert at it. And I haven't been a part of a lot of them as a coach either. This is new territory for me. I'm not an expert at it."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Steelers’ Taylor ‘hurt’ by pay cut
- Steelers among teams using new helmet-camera technology
- Steelers rookie linebacker Shazier showing plenty of sizzle
- Kovacevic: Steelers’ offensive identity, anyone?