ShareThis Page

Harris: Dominant Steelers show no mercy to Carolina

| Friday, Dec. 24, 2010

The Steelers didn't mess around with Carolina.

The Panthers didn't want any part of the Steelers.

The best way to put a bad team out of its misery is to beat it down early and often. That's what the Steelers did Thursday night on a cold and wintry night at Heinz Field because that's what good teams do.

The Steelers don't need help from anyone. They control their playoff destiny. If they defeat Cleveland in the final regular-season game, they'll be the No. 2 seed in the AFC behind New England. That means a bye and extra week of rest and recovery for safety Troy Polamalu and defensive end Aaron Smith.

It was a strange week for the Steelers, who weren't in the best of moods after a tough home loss to the New York Jets.

The team's biggest challenge didn't come from Carolina; it came from their fourth-year coach.

Mike Tomlin called some of his players old. While it was a stale motivational ploy — a coach reaching deep into his bag of tricks to pump up self-motivated veterans who didn't need the kick in the pants — darned if it didn't work.

Tomlin has cornered the market on four-leaf clovers. He's been pushing the right buttons all season.

Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger missed the first four games because of a suspension, and the Steelers won.

Key players have been injured, and the Steelers keep winning.

Anyone detect a trend?

Tomlin doesn't have a "system" or call attention to himself, so he probably won't be in serious consideration for coach of the year accolades. But he deserves consideration because the Steelers weren't given much of a chance to win nine games at the start of the season much less 11 and possibly 12.

Of course, facing two-win Carolina helps when you're playing without Polamalu, Smith, Max Starks and Willie Colon, to name but four. But when you're hot, you're hot.

About the only thing the Steelers did wrong was fail to score after recovering a fumble on a kickoff return at the Carolina 28-yard line late in the first half. In the second half, the Steelers' biggest challenge was not losing interest.

Did we mention that Carolina has talent issues?

The Steelers were so much in control that they didn't need to resort to their shotgun spread attack that gave the offense life against the against the Jets and Cincinnati.

The shotgun spread is an interesting gadget. For a team like the Steelers, who struggle with pass protection, it forces the defense to account for four and five receivers with man coverage, reducing the number of players available to rush the quarterback.

The Steelers used the formation often against the Jets. As a result, Roethlisberger was relatively pressure-free.

The shotgun spread opened up the running game, as Rashard Mendenhall rushed for 100 yards and a touchdown against the Jets. Of course, the Steelers also learned a hard lesson when they ran a draw play from their 3-yard line and Mewelde Moore was tackled for a safety.

Tight end Heath Miller's return from post-concussion symptoms also reduced the need for four and five receivers against the Panthers. Miller had four receptions for 59 yards in the first half alone.

Roethlisberger and receiver Mike Wallace are developing a special chemistry. They connected on a 43-yard touchdown pass-and-run — emphasis on run — in the second quarter that featured Wallace covering the final 30 yards about as fast as a cheetah.

By halftime, Roethlisberger had completed 16 of 23 passes for 259 yards and a touchdown. By comparison, Carolina managed only 84 total yards.

If the NFL had a mercy rule, they would have used it last night. The Panthers were out of their league.

Photo Galleries

Steelers vs. Panthers December 23, 2010

Steelers vs. Panthers   December 23, 2010

The Steelers defeat Carolina, 27-3, Thursday December 23, 2010 at Heinz Field.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.