NFL reduces Harrison's fine for hit on Massaquoi
The NFL put $25,000 back into James Harrison's bank account.
The Steelers outside linebacker had a $75,000 fine for a flagrant hit on a defenseless receiver reduced to $50,000.
Harrison had lost an earlier appeal of the fine for his hit on Browns receiver Mohamed Massaquoi on Oct. 17.
Appeals officer Ted Cottrell reviewed that appeal after reducing the fines of Patriots safety Brandon Meriweather and Falcons cornerback Dunta Robinson for similar infractions.
"We're grateful that they did this," said Bill Parise, Harrison's agent. "We got a Pro Bowl and a fine reduction in the same week."
The NFL said in a statement that Cottrell recommended reducing Harrison's fine to Roger Goodell and that the commissioner "fully supported the decision."
According to the statement, "Cottrell said he reduced the fines because the players said they understood the rules and have made efforts to adjust their techniques to play with the rules that protect player safety."
Harrison has been fined four times this season for a total of $100,000 and twice since the Massaquoi hit.
Harrison was docked $20,000 for drilling Drew Brees in the back after the Saints quarterback threw a pass. Harrison, a four-time Pro Bowler, was docked $25,000 for hitting Ryan Fitzpatrick while the Bills quarterback was in what the NFL considered a defenseless position.
5 : Steelers' AFC rank in rushing offense (121.6 yards per game)
9 : Wins the Steelers have in as many games this season when leading at halftime
"I appreciate him for his kind words, and I definitely think he should have been on there, too. We had a lot of players that have played well throughout the season and kind of deserve to go. We all know the politics of being a Pro Bowl player and making the Pro Bowl."
James Farrior, Steelers linebacker, on teammate Lawrence Timmons saying that Farrior should have made the Pro Bowl.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.