Steelers' running game has more effective 2010 season
• Team president Art Rooney II gave coach Mike Tomlin a mandate to improve the running game, and Tomlin's offense did just that. The Steelers improved from a No. 19 ranking in rushing in 2009 (112.1 yards per game) to No. 11 this season (120.2). Rushes per game increased from 26.8 to 29.4. The Steelers struck a perfect balance between the run and pass. They averaged only a fraction more passes per game at 29.9. Last year, the Steelers averaged nearly seven more passes per game (33.5).
• Veteran receiver Hines Ward addressed the offense making better use of time of possession this season. The Steelers ranked No. 5 in time of possession (32:24) compared with a No. 2 ranking (32:52) in 2009. "Our passing game is different from last year," Ward said. "Last year, (Santonio Holmes) was over 1,000 yards receiving, I was over 1,000 yards. Heath Miller had nearly 80 catches (76). We were tearing it up. We just didn't complement our defense. We have to make sure we didn't leave our defense on the field too long." When the Steelers won Super Bowl XL, Ward said, "we didn't have any 1,000 yards guys, but we were very efficient."
• The Steelers have recent history against each of next week's potential playoff opponents: Baltimore, Indianapolis and Kansas City. The Steelers played Baltimore twice this season, losing, 17-14, at Heinz Field and winning, 13-10, in Baltimore. In December 2008, the Steelers lost to Indianapolis, 24-20, at Heinz Field. Last season, the Stelers lost to the Chiefs, 27-24, in overtime in Kansas City, Mo.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.