Steelers' Smith stuck 'in limbo'
Aaron Smith won't put a percentage on his health or chances of playing in Sunday's AFC Championship Game against the New York Jets, even though the Steelers defensive end believes he can be effective at 50 percent.
Smith, out since late October with a torn triceps, said Wednesday the decision of whether he can play will come after consulting with coaches and team doctors later this week. But Smith promised he won't do anything detrimental to the Steelers' Super Bowl hopes.
"We'll have to see how I feel, how things progress," Smith said. "Hopefully, I can stand up and make the decision. If I think I'm going to hurt the team, then I'll say no."
Coach Mike Tomlin said Smith, who has missed the past 11 games, was too valuable to place on season-ending injured reserve and that the Steelers remain hopeful he can contribute this postseason.
"That's the reason why we've carried him for this long," Tomlin said. "He is a quality player and person and, if he's in a helmet, it benefits him."
The 6-foot-5, 298-pound Smith did virtually nothing during practice yesterday. Smith said tests taken Friday revealed his healing "wasn't as far along as I wanted it to be." He described his status as "in limbo."
Smith was surprised at Tomlin's suggestion this week of putting the 12th-year veteran on a snap count if he returns to the lineup. Smith rarely came out of games when healthy.
"I've never been on a snap count," he said. "Usually, when I come off the field is when I want to come off the field, so it was kind of weird for him to say there is a snap count involved. I get to my limit, and then I'm done. 'Pull him off the field, and he's done.' What if I knock (all the plays) out early in the game?"
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.