Jets secondary will test Steelers' wide receivers
The Steelers' receiving corps will be tested by a New York Jets secondary that features top cover corners Darrelle Revis and Antonio Cromartie but lost safety Jim Leonhard to injury.
How the Steelers fare throwing the ball against the Jets could help determine the outcome of Sunday's AFC Championship Game.
A comparison of the average regular- and postseason statistics of Steelers receivers Mike Wallace, Hines Ward, Emmanuel Sanders, Antwaan Randle El and Antonio Brown and Jets cornerbacks Revis, Cromartie and Kyle Wilson and safeties Eric Smith and Dwight Lowery:
• Receptions: 11.6
• Yards: 175.4
• Touchdowns: 1
• Tackles: 11.4
• Passes defended: 3.1
• Interceptions: 0.3
• Jets passing yards allowed per game: 204.9
• Steelers receivers yards per game: 175.4
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.