ShareThis Page

Injured Packers upset about team photo

| Wednesday, Jan. 26, 2011

In the first of what is sure to be several mini-controversies that take on lives of their own in advance of Super Bowl XLV, at least two Green Bay players on injured reserve have expressed disappointment they won't be in the team picture that will be taken in Arlington, Texas, during Media Day.

Through their Twitter accounts, linebacker Nick Barnett and tight end Jermichael Finley indicated the decision didn't sit well with them.

The problem, from the Packers' point of view, is they're not the only two players on injured reserve. Had the Packers not had 15 players on injured reserve, things might have been handled differently.

"It was a team decision driven by the sheer number of players on IR," a Packers spokesman said. "Our primary focus is to get the team ready to beat the Pittsburgh Steelers. Every decision we make is about trying to win a world championship."

There are logistical reasons that the injured-reserve players won't be part of the team picture.

The Packers are off site, meaning their medical/training facilities won't be as extensive as they are at team headquarters, where they can handle more injured players. In Arlington, the team will need all the space possible to treat the active players with injuries and therefore might not be able to treat the injured-reserve players who need attention.

The injured-reserve players will join the team Thursday in Arlington. They will be on the sideline during the game and will be entitled to all the benefits the rest of the players receive.

In a text message to the Green Bay Press-Gazette, Barnett said: "Well they don't want IR players down there till Thursday, but I have heard in the past other (teams) don't do that."

Earlier in the day, Barnett tweeted: "Kinda sad. Found out basically IR guys can not be in team picture. .. It's kinda sad to think.. Just goes you injured yourself you not part ..."

Finley tweeted: "I never trip (about) anything, but the way IR players are getting treated not cool."

Barnett, via Twitter, later apologized.

"I was not trying to be a distraction nor was I downing the organization they have done so much for me over last 8 years. ... Just saying I am sad that it worked out the way it did. This game is bigger then my feelings and my body of work. It's about 'One Goal!' "

Hornung picks Packers

Pro Football Hall of Famer Paul Hornung is siding with some old friends in the Super Bowl.

The former Packers running back said his old team will beat the Steelers by a field goal.

Hornung said the Packers could be on the verge of a dynasty similar to the one he helped the team build in the 1960s, when Green Bay won five NFL titles, including the first two Super Bowls.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.