ShareThis Page

Rooneys react to Mendenhall tweets

| Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Steelers president Art Rooney II said it was difficult to "even comprehend" the controversial comments made by Rashard Mendenhall on Monday on Twitter, and a crisis communications expert said the running back would be "well-advised" to apologize.

Mendenhall ignited a firestorm when he questioned why people were celebrating the killing of 9/11 mastermind Osama bin Laden. Mendenhall, on the social media site, asked how people could "HATE" a man they had never heard speak and questioned whether the planes flown into the World Trade Center by terrorists could have brought down the Twin Towers.

Mendenhall's incendiary remarks drew a raft of criticism and compelled the Steelers to respond.

"I have not spoken with Rashard, so it is hard to explain or even comprehend what he means with his recent Twitter comments," Rooney said in a statement. "The entire Steelers' organization is very proud of the job our military personnel have done, and we can only hope this leads to our troops coming home soon."

Neither Rooney nor any of the Steelers' executives and coaches are allowed to contact Mendenhall during the NFL lockout. Mike McCartney, Mendenhall's agent, declined comment.

Gene Grabowski, a senior vice president at Levick Strategic Communications in Washington, said Mendenhall committed a common mistake among young celebrities that are on Twitter: He didn't think about the impact of his entries.

"I think Mr. Mendenhall would be well-advised to apologize as quickly as possible," said Grabowski, who's from Pittsburgh and graduated from Pitt. "The public expects and appreciates that athletes and celebrities will have opinions on issues, but where it becomes a problem is when an athlete or celebrity shares those opinions so freely without apparent regard for the sensitivities of people who have suffered loss or feel strongly about a subject."

The killing of bin Laden touched off mass celebrations across the country. Steelers chairman emeritus Dan Rooney, the U.S. Ambassador to Ireland, hailed the military operation that resulted in the demise of the world's most notorious terrorist.

"I am proud and grateful for the President and all the men and women of intelligence and military communities for their constant demonstration of courage and bravery," Rooney said. "Their actions this weekend have made the world a safer and more just place to live for all humanity."

Mendenhall, who turns 24 in June, expressed a contrarian view on his Twitter account.

"It's amazing how people can HATE a man they have never even heard speak. We've only heard one side ..." he wrote.

This isn't the first time Mendenhall has made controversial posts on Twitter.

In March, he supported Vikings running back Adrian Peterson's claim that the NFL owners' treatment of players was akin to modern-day slavery. It came shortly after the owners locked out the players following the breakdown of talks on a new collective bargaining agreement.

Later that month at the NFL owners' meetings, Art Rooney II shrugged off Mendenhall's comments regarding the lockout.

"It's a frustrating time for the guys, so I'm not going to get too worked up about it," Rooney said at the time.

Mendenhall, the Steelers' first-round pick in 2008, has rushed for more than 1,000 yards the past two seasons. He finished seventh in the NFL in rushing last season (1,273 yards on 324 carries) and tied for second in rushing touchdowns (13).

Mendenhall, who lost a costly fumble in the Steelers' 31-25 loss to the Packers in Super Bowl XLV, has two years left on his contract.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.