Hynoski making his mark with Giants
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. — Thursday was just another day of work for Henry Hynoski.
Although, from the etched Giants logo on the glass doors of the team's facilities in East Rutherford, N.J. to the white NY on the side of his helmet, it was more than apparent that Hynoski was deeply entrenched in training camp for the New York Giants.
Hynoski, an undrafted free agent out of Pitt and a Southern Columbia High School grad, is one of 88 players in camp. While he is the only fullback listed on the roster, there are 22 other undrafted free agents from this year's class with him.
Wearing No. 45, the former Tiger and Panther split first-team reps with third-year tight end Bear Pascoe when a fullback was called for in the offensive set, but did get the nod in goal line situations over Pascoe.
During an open practice session in the shadow of New Meadowlands Stadium, the fullback ran reps behind all four quarterbacks in camp, including starter Eli Manning and backups Sage Rosenfels and David Carr, and flashed what could make him stand out — a sticky pair of hands.
Several times, in both 7-on-7 drills and a full-team workouts, Hynoski ran patterns in the flat and caught the ball each time, showing the versatility he so rarely got to display at Pitt.
Hynoski was also part of the team's punt coverage group during special teams drills, and, as was often the case when he wasn't in the huddle, he was picking the brain of nearby coaches and veterans. He is in line to replace Madison Hedgecock, who the Giants cut Friday, July 29. The Giants were also unable to sign free-agent fullback Vonta Leach, which shows a commitment to the running game with tailbacks Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw, who combined to rush for 2,058 yards last season.
The Giants play their first preseason game, 8 p.m. Saturday at Carolina.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.