Steelers' Starks may start Sunday at left tackle
Max Starks is pushing to start at left tackle Sunday for the Steelers.
Starks, who re-signed with the Steelers yesterday, again took significant snaps with the first-team offense. And offensive Bruce Arians said after practice today that Starks could start against the Tennessee Titans because of his familiarity with the Steelers' offense.
Starks said he took 66 to 75 percent of the snaps with the first-team offense today. Yesterday, Starks split first-team snaps at left tackle with Jonathan Scott, who has practiced both days this week after missing last Sunday's game because of a sprained ankle.
"The biggest thing is to make sure I have everything down pat, working and communicating fluidly with the rest of the guys," Starks said. "Hopefully Sunday I have that opportunity to (start)."
There will be at least one change along the offensive line.
Arians said Doug Legursky will return to the starting lineup but at left guard instead of right guard. Ramon Foster will make his second consecutive start at right guard and Legursky will fill in for Chris Kemoeatu at left guard. Legursky started the first three games at right guard but didn't play against the Houston Texans because of a shoulder injury.
Kemoeatu, who has not practiced this week, has been hampered by a knee injury since before training camp. Arians said Kemoeaetu probably shouldn't have played last Sunday, but that he gutted it out because the Steelers were short-handed on the offensive line.
Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, who sprained his left foot against the Texans, was a full participant in practice today and is in line to start against the visiting Titans.
"I always plan to play Sunday, " Roethlisberger said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.