ShareThis Page

Yards (and losses) pile up for Rams' Stephen Jackson

| Sunday, Dec. 25, 2011

Steven Jackson hasn't been part of a winning team since his was drafted by the St. Louis Rams in 2004.

In fact, he's been a part of some of the worst teams in NFL history, including this year's group that fell to 2-13 with a 27-0 loss Saturday to the Steelers at Heinz Field.

However, there is no correlation between the Rams' record and how Jackson produces on the football field.

"On a level of admiration on a scale of 1 to 10, I'm at a 15," Rams coach Steve Spagnuolo said. "I don't know how else to say it. He is a very passionate football player. He is passionate about how he plays, the way he plays. He's very passionate about the team he plays for and the guys he plays for."

Jackson rushed for 103 yards on 24 carries yesterday and surpassed the 1,000-yard mark for the seventh consecutive season with a 3-yard run in the second quarter.

Only six other running backs in NFL history have rushed for 1,000 yards in seven consecutive seasons, and none on a team that has lost as much as the Rams.

"It's a huge achievement," Jackson said. "It is something that you dream about, something that you are amazed of."

Jackson has 1,069 rushing yards this season despite missing the better part of two games with a leg injury. His 103 yards against the Steelers was the 31st 100-yard game of his career and just the seventh the Steelers have allowed over the past seven years.

"You go over 100 yards against that defense, that's saying something," Rams quarterback Kellen Clemens said.

Jackson is the franchise leader in rushing with 9,107 yards - or nearly 2,000 more than Eric Dickerson.

"It is unfortunate that we do these kinds of things against a team that is so impressive and you come out with a loss," Jackson said. "You play for wins and losses."

Wins have been few and far between for Jackson. The Rams have won only 29 games since Jackson became a full-time starter in 2005.

"I remember my rookie season when we went 1-15," linebacker James Laurinaitis said. "He was a guy that I looked at to see how to battle through it like a professional."

Jackson isn't looking to get out of St. Louis even though he could void his contract after the season if he reaches a pair of escalator clauses next week against San Francisco. One of those clauses isn't likely to happen - he would need 198 yards receiving.

It doesn't matter to Jackson.

"It is probably one of those questions that I probably will reflect on after my career is over," Jackson said about going to a winning organization. "But I love St. Louis."

Photo Galleries

Steelers vs. St. Louis Rams December 24, 2011

Steelers vs. St. Louis Rams  December 24, 2011

The Pittsburgh Steelers defeat the St. Louis Rams 27-0 at Heinz field, Saturday, December 24, 2011.

Additional Information:

Seven up

A list of the seven NFL running backs to amass at least seven consecutive seasons of 1,000 yards rushing

Emmitt Smith : 11 years; Hall of Fame member

Barry Sanders : 10 years; Hall of Fame member

Curtis Martin : 10 years; Retired, HOF eligible

Thurman Thomas : 8 years, Hall of Fame member

LaDainian Tomlinson : 8 years, active

Eric Dickerson : 7 years, Hall of Fame member

Steven Jackson : 7 years, active

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.