Starkey: One last debate over Arians
If we're talking lightning-rod local sports figures since 2000 -- and why wouldn't we be• -- then Bruce Arians deserves special mention.
He might even be in the Hall of Fame.
Kordell Stewart, Bill Cowher, Bob Nutting, Ben Roethlisberger, Marc-Andre Fleury, Mike Mularkey, Tommy Maddox, Matt Cavanaugh, Walt Harris and Dave Wannstedt, among others, spring to mind.
The mere mention of any of the above could spark weeks of irrational talk-show debate. Sometimes years.
Can you imagine if the Steelers hire ex-Colts coach Jim Caldwell as their new offensive coordinator• Within three games his blank stare would become a reliable source of fan fury.
Arians was magical in his ability to inspire rage. When he "retired" Friday -- kind of the way Wannstedt "resigned" from Pitt -- lines lit up with desired replacements.
I swear to you, the following names were suggested: Harris, Cavanaugh, Charlie Batch, Brian Billick and Jon Gruden. Somebody even mentioned Todd Graham, whose dream job, I hear, is calling plays in the NFL.
He has family here, too.
But forget all that. We'd be remiss if we let Arians go without one more bitter Bruce debate. Let's shoot for a semirational one centered on a simple question: Did he deserve this?
Arians Basher: "Of course he did. The Steelers don't score enough. Simple as that. They finished top 10 in scoring once in his five years here. Score points!"
Arians Defender: "Win games. Work around injuries and incompetence -- did you see the lines this guy had to work with• -- and do your best work in the biggest games. Arians did that. They did win a Super Bowl with him."
Basher: "They won a Super Bowl with Mitch Berger, too. Does that mean he was a good punter?"
Defender: "Berger didn't design the winning play."
Basher: "Big Ben's improvisational brilliance was the key that year. The defense kept things close until Ben would finally burn the playbook, go sandlot and win the game."
Defender: "How about last year's playoffs• Arians put up 31 points on the Ravens and pounded the Jets for a half. Remember, the Jets had just throttled New England's record-setting offense. The Steelers also scored 25 in the Super Bowl. Did Arians fumble in the fourth quarter or miss the block that led to the Packers' pick-six• Did he get shredded by Aaron Rodgers?"
Basher: "The offense stunk this season. A complete waste of talent."
Defender: "One, it was the youngest in the AFC after Hines was demoted. Two, Jonathan Scott started the season at left tackle, a rookie started at right tackle, and Chris Kemoeatu existed. You want to design an offense around that• Three, speaking of talent, it's interesting that so many skill players have realized their potential in this system, isn't it."
Basher: "You have to run the ball more effectively."
Defender: "Who are you, Art Rooney II• They averaged 4.4 yards per attempt, best in a decade."
Basher: "More short passes. They always go for broke."
Defender: "Actually, they don't. And if they stopped throwing long, you'd be screaming, 'How can they waste all that speed?'"
Basher: "Believe this: They should have run it more at Denver. Redman was killing it."
Defender: "They couldn't run until the second half, when Denver expected pass. They also should have scored at least 35 points, except that players kept screwing up. Did you see the errant snap, the mangled 52-yard pass, the Cotchery drop and Ben's fumble at the end• All those drives were headed for points."
Basher: "I'm still trying to get over the wide receiver end-around from the six-inch line."
Defender: "It worked."
Basher: "Of course, I'm still trying to get over Ben's bootleg against Jacksonville in '07 and 32 passes in a wind storm at Cleveland two years ago. Did that work?"
Defender: "No. No it didn't."
Basher: "I'm sick of the excuses. The red zone was the Bermuda Triangle for this guy. We should have called him 'Field Goal Bruce.' A bubble screen to Wallace on 3rd and 7 at the Denver 29. Really?"
Defender: "The bubble screen got a bad name. Statistics say it was an effective play, but let's not let the facts get in the way of a good rant."
Basher: "Give me a coach who'll put his foot down with Ben."
Defender: "If Ben got his way all the time, he'd have been running tons of no-huddle and calling his own plays. He and Arians had an excellent relationship. Besides, what's wrong with keeping your $102 million quarterback happy?"
Basher: "Yeah, keep him happy. I suppose they'll promote (quarterbacks coach) Randy Fichtner, then. Cousin Randy replaces Uncle Bruce. You think Ben won't run him over like The Bus on Brian Urlacher?"
Defender: "This time next year, you'll be sorry they did this. You'll be tired of looking at Jim Caldwell, if they hire him, I can tell you that."
Basher: "Jim Caldwell• Is he the guy with the blank stare?"
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Rossi: It’s past time for NFL to protect players
- Steelers stalled by Seahawks, on outside of AFC wild-card picture
- Steelers’ Roethlisberger reported symptoms that led to his exit vs. Seahawks
- Family of man accused of shooting St. Clair officer say allegations don’t fit his character
- Steelers players say they support Tomlin’s attempts at deception
- Steelers notebook: Seahawks’ Sherman gets better of WR Brown
- School lunch group hopes to revise rules it calls impractical, too restrictive
- Obama: Climate pact an ‘act of defiance’ after Paris attacks
- Sports Deli is latest tenant to say goodbye to Parkway Center Mall
- University of Pittsburgh researchers revisit war of electric currents
- Pennsylvania Game Commission reaps revenue from shale gas under game lands