What has been an offseason of change for the Steelers continued Wednesday when they terminated the contracts of veteran cornerback Bryant McFadden and receiver Arnaz Battle.
And it is still early.
McFadden, a starter on the Steelers' past two Super Bowl teams, and Battle each had a year left on their respective contracts. Releasing them saves the Steelers a little more than $3.5 million against the salary cap.
McFadden started the 2011 season-opener, but he missed the next three games with a nagging hamstring injury and lost his job to William Gay. McFadden, who played in three Super Bowls with the Steelers and won a pair of rings, also gave way to rookie cornerbacks Cortez Allen and Curtis Brown as the season progressed.
Battle, who signed with the Steelers as an unrestricted free agent in 2010, served as a special-teams captain the past two seasons. He did not catch a pass while with the Steelers, struggling to get on the field because of the team's depth at receiver.
In a series of moves Wednesday, the Steelers also signed a trio of players to offseason contracts, including cornerback Myron Rolle.
Rolle, a former Florida State standout, spent the 2010 season on the Tennessee Titans' practice squad. The Steelers also signed receiver Juamorris Stewart, who spent part of the 2010 offseason with the Arizona Cardinals, and linebacker Brandon Hicks.
Hicks spent part of training camp last season with the Buffalo Bills.
The Steelers released tight end Miguel Chavis and linebacker Erik Clanton. Each had signed as undrafted free agents in July but got hurt during the preseason.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.