Hines Ward pleads guilty to reckless driving in Georgia
Steelers wide receiver Hines Ward pleaded guilty to reckless driving Wednesday in a DeKalb County, Ga., courtroom in a case stemming from a traffic stop and arrest last summer.
Ward also pleaded no contest to a charge of failing to maintain his lane as part of a plea agreement that resulted in the county solicitor's office dropping a DUI charge.
State Court Judge Stacey K. Hydrick sentenced Ward to 12 months of probation. She also fined Ward $2,000 and ordered him to perform 80 hours of community service.
"We are grateful for the outcome," said Andrew Ree, Ward's attorney and manager. "Hines has always maintained that his ability to drive was in no way impaired and we are pleased that the facts support his innocence. ... Hines has a great respect for the legal system and is also grateful in particular to the state for the professional manner in which they handled this matter."
Hydrick ordered Ward to undergo an alcohol evaluation and participate in a risk reduction program. She agreed to allow him to check in via phone or email for his probation to accommodate his travel as an NFL player.
Police arrested Ward just outside Atlanta last summer when an officer saw him hit a curb in his Aston Martin in the early-morning hours of July 9. Ward failed a field sobriety test and was arrested. He posted $1,000 bond and was released hours later.
The Super Bowl XL MVP has played 14 years in the NFL, all with the Steelers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.