General manager Colbert: Steelers wouldn't condone bounties
Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert said the organization would never condone bounties placed on opposing players.
"To intentionally set out to injure another player, there's absolutely no room for that in our game or any other game," Colbert said during an interview on Steelers.com.
Colbert also said the organization does its due diligence in the locker room to make sure nothing like that happens.
The New Orleans Saints are being investigated by commissioner Roger Goodell for an alleged bounty system used against opposing players.
"You always think that you are ahead of it, but you don't know for sure," Colbert said. "You always want to make sure that your house is in order, and we are comfortable that our house has been in order."
> > Talking for the first time since releasing key veterans last week, Steelers coach Mike Tomlin said it was difficult to cut accomplished veterans such as Hines Ward, James Farrior and Aaron Smith.
"You try to remove emotion from it more than anything, but that's a difficult thing to do," Tomlin said. "These guys have made a lot of plays for us. They've provided great leadership. They've been significant members of teams that have been very successful. As human beings, we all feel that and acknowledge that. When it comes to making the decision, it has to be football-based, with the building of the team moving forward."
Smith, Ward and Farrior accumulated 42 seasons and accounted for seven Pro Bowl selections, while being integral to six division titles, three AFC Championships and two Super Bowl titles.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.