ShareThis Page

Harris: Who's next for Duquesne?

| Tuesday, April 3, 2012

If Duquesne wants sizzle, Orlando Antigua, the former Pitt player and assistant and current Kentucky assistant, is the popular choice.

Who's hotter than Antigua?

When your team plays in two consecutive Final Fours while producing enough lottery picks to field an NBA expansion team, you sit at the head of the table.

Antigua dominated talk among college basketball coaches and administrators meeting over the weekend in New Orleans about being the best candidate to replace Ron Everhart. Antigua is a familiar name from a big-time program who has paid his dues.

That said, Akron coach Keith Dambrot is no slouch. In eight seasons at Akron, Dambrot has authored seven 20-win campaigns (he went 19-10 in his first season). He recruits Western Pennsylvania as well as anyone in the country.

We know Antigua can recruit (see: Anthony Davis), but can he coach?

In Antigua's case, does being a good recruiter make you a good coach?

"If it comes down to (Dambrot) and Orlando, it's an intriguing choice," said John Giammarco, director of the Pittsburgh Basketball Club Summer Pro-Am League. "It's a difficult job, but both men would be great choices."

Dambrot told the Akron Beacon-Journal that Duquesne reached out to him, but no offer was made. Dambrot said he doesn't want to leave Akron.

However, Dambrot might feel differently if Duquesne offered the job.

Why should Dambrot commit to another school without a legitimate offer• If he were giving serious thought to leaving his alma mater, it would help if there were a concrete offer. At the Final Four, where he attended various meetings, Giammarco said Antigua was the favorite to be Duquesne's coach.

"This is Orlando's job to say no to. That's what I'm hearing," Giammarco said. "Orlando's worked under some good coaches John Calipari, Jamie Dixon. He was pretty heavily involved in recruiting Davis.

"I know Orlando all the way back to his playing days here (Antigua attended Pitt from 1991-95). I would love to see him come home."

You have to keep things in perspective, though. As a head coach, Dambrot, whose father, Sid, played basketball at Duquesne from 1952-54, knows what he's doing he's 184-87 at Akron with two trips to the NCAA Tournament and a pair of NIT appearances featuring players familiar to local hoops fans: McKeesport's Zeke Marshall, Moon's Brian Walsh, Shenango's Steve McNees and Elizabeth Forward's Steve Swiech.

"Dambrot would be a very good choice for Duquesne," Giammarco said. "The reports that I get back from the kids when they come home to play in the Pro-Am League, they tell me how strong of a program (Akron) is."

Said Hempfield coach Jim Nesser, who dealt with Dambrot when he coached Swiech at Elizabeth Forward, "I compare him a little bit to Dixon at Pitt. He never recruited the best blue-chip athletes, but he had kids who improved ... and was very successful."

That's what should ultimately shape athletic director Greg Amodio's decision. What exactly is Duquesne looking for?

Is it a feel-good hire who will excite the administration, alumni and media• That would be Antigua.

Dambrot, who grew up in Akron, played basketball for the Zips and coached LeBron James in high school, has said he has no interest in Duquesne. But that's without Duquesne making an offer.

Why wouldn't Dambrot be interested if the price is right?

Antigua could ease into Duquesne's vacancy like an old, comfortable pair of shoes. He's deserving of the promotion. Unless Dambrot has a change of heart, it's probably Antigua's job if he wants it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.