Officials ignored volatile situation in arena deal
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, March 15, 2007
An explosive financial review of the Washington Township Volunteer Fire Department alleges that a former fire chief, his girlfriend and the son of a township official were involved in a series of transactions that cost the department as much as $250,000.
But the critical audit fails to mention that the township's volunteer firefighters were also harmed financially by the indifference of the law enforcement community.
When the first whiffs of financial impropriety at the department began floating across the township, Fayette County District Attorney Nancy Vernon dismissed requests to look into the situation, saying there wasn't enough information to substantiate claims of illegal activity.
After Vernon failed to do her job, the state Attorney General's Office took a bye, allowing the then-financially struggling fire department to fend for itself.
Well, fend it did.
The department reached into its depleted treasury to come up with $3,000 to hire the Pittsburgh-based Nottingham Group to conduct a forensic accounting investigation of the depatment's finances during the reign of former Chief Randy Smalley.
That resulted in the release Tuesday night of the report that alleged:
n A portion of $75,000 given to the department by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to purchase pagers, portable radios and protective gear was paid to a company owned by Smalley and cannot be accounted for, the report states. As a result, the fire department was forced to repay part of the grant to FEMA.
n Property owned by the department that had been assessed at more than $100,000 was sold in 2001 to Michael Latkanich, son of township Supervisor Joanne Latkanich, for $35,000. The new owner failed to notify tax officials of a change in the status of the property from nonprofit to for-profit and did not pay any taxes to the state or township for several years. The property, now owned by Michael Latkanich's sister, Rochelle, currently is up for sale with a listing price of $229,000 after Michael Latkanich unsuccessfully tried to sell it on eBay for $240,000.
n A house owned by the fire department was leased to Smalley and his girlfriend, Roxanne Ceccarelli, for 30 months, but records indicate they never paid any rent.
n Investigators were unable to identify the winners of a boat valued at more than $30,000 that was a prize in a 2001 department fundraiser. The investigators' report states fire department members "have alleged that evidence indicates that Smalley did not distribute the boat to a prize- winner, but actually kept it for himself." Investigators could not prove that Smalley kept the boat, but the matter is under investigation.
n Investigators cited a possible conflict of interest when Smalley, an electrician, performed more than $13,000 in electrical work for the township without obtaining any bids or estimates from other contractors.
After already spending three large for the audit, the department has dipped into its treasury again to hire Pittsburgh attorney Joseph Paletta to determine whether to press a civil lawsuit or criminal charges in the case.
The firefighters also are paying to send copies of the Nottingham Group's report to Vernon, Attorney General Tom Corbett and the Internal Revenue Service.
Hopefully, somebody in one of those offices will finally take a look at the situation to determine whether any charges are warranted.
That is, after all, what they are paid to do.
While they're doing that, they also should take a look at the circumstances behind the demise of Community Ambulance Service, which provided emergency medical services to the township until it was forced to close its doors after inexplicably running out of money.
That's another instance where Vernon, Corbett and company have turned a deaf ear to repeated calls for an investigation.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.