ShareThis Page

Specter displays lack of character

| Wednesday, May 6, 2009

All you ever wanted to know about Arlen Specter's character comes from his Sunday appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press":

n Speaking to a deal that allows the party-switching senior U.S. senator of Pennsylvania to keep his seniority, Mr. Specter blurted, "That's an entitlement!"

See, Arlen really is a Dimmycrat.

n Far worse, however, was Specter's vomit -- and that's the only word for it -- that the actions of the Republican Party somehow killed Jack Kemp, the former congressman of New York who died of cancer last weekend.

Aside from the poor form, Specter apparently forgets, as The Wall Street Journal did not, that it was Republicans who more than doubled funding for federal biomedical research in the 12 years ending in 2006.

Additionally, far more private venture capital is invested in such research in the United States than in foreign countries. But rest assured, that all will change if the policies that Specter's new party is proposing become law.

Oh, by the way, it was the White House that said Specter told President Obama that he'd be "a loyal Democrat." Specter denies he ever said it.

Give him a month or so -- he'll deny he ever switched parties or concocted the single-bullet theory in the JFK assassination.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.