Teen driver distracted in Indiana Township bicyclist's death, report finds
A teenage driver who stuck and killed a bicycle rider last month along Harts Run Road in Indiana Township was distracted by his flip-flops, Allegheny County police said.
The early morning mishap felled Donald Parker, 52, of Hampton, who was riding to work in the RIDC Park in O'Hara. He died later in the morning during surgery at a Pittsburgh hospital.
County police Lt. Bill Palmer said a 17-year-old boy was on his way to school at Fox Chapel Area High School when he looked away, drove off the side of the road and hit Parker.
Parker was a software programming manager for Aptech Computer Systems Inc. at Delta Drive.
Palmer said detectives have concluded their investigation.
"The report has been sent to the district attorney's office to see if anything beyond possibly careless driving will be charged," he said.
The district attorney's office didn't return calls of inquiry.
Parker was making the eight-mile ride from his house to work as preparation for an annual charity bicycle run. He was peddling on the shoulder of the road and the 17-year-old was heading in the same direction and was distracted, according to Palmer.
Palmer said the youth remains devastated by the accident.
Parker is survived by his widow and three children. His riding was part of his preparation for a 140-mile Multiple Sclerosis Foundation benefit ride that starts Saturday.
According to PennDOT, there were 16 bicycle fatalities across the state last year. That was double the previous year, but four fewer than in 2007.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.