Attendees at Altmire's town hall meeting vent anger over policies
U.S. Rep. Jason Altmire's town hall meeting in Springdale attracted members of the Tea Party movement, and much of the discussion drew ire from those in attendance.
Topics in the open forum ranged from federal spending to health care to illegal immigration.
On those issues, among others, the McCandless Democrat said he's voted against party leadership, and with his constituents.
Noting the recession, Altmire said the Wall Street bailout and health-care reform haven't helped, adding that he voted against those bills.
A balanced budget bill could help, he said, and government needs to tighten its belt.
"We have an economy that is treading water at best," Altmire said.
Sheila Paul, of Ross Township, held her 8-week-old grandson and told Altmire that the infant is already $40,000 in debt.
Paul said her daughter is serving in active duty in the military, and asked what she's defending, if it's a nation that continues to recklessly spend.
Her remarks drew a standing ovation from the audience of about 70 people.
She questioned Altmire's vote on the stimulus bill. Altmire said that one-third of the stimulus was tax cuts that affected 95 percent of Americans and that the bill funded infrastructure such as the VA Butler Healthcare hospital.
Paul further pressed, asking for Altmire's annual salary, to which he responded $174,000.
When questioned on repealing the health-care bill, audience members applauded.
While Altmire said the bill should not have been passed, but he also said there will not be the votes to overturn the bill. He said he understands constituents' anger.
"Repeal is not a viable option," Altmire said, drawing murmurs and shouts of "repeal it" from the audience.
"I don't support doing something that has absolutely no chance at success," he said.
Altmire said he doubts audience members will disagree with him over immigration, saying the country must secure the border, penalize employers who hire illegal immigrants and make sure illegal residents don't receive any social services benefits.
"I think if you catch them," Altmire said, "you need to send them back."
Arizona has every right to ensure the safety of its citizens, Altmire said.
"I support Arizona," he said. "... they have every right to do that."
Bruce Kennedy asked the congressman what he will do to reverse what he calls "socialistic" policies. Kennedy, of Valencia, is a member of the Tea Party movement and the 9-12 Project, a movement started by conservative pundit Glenn Beck.
Frank William Moore, a 9-12 Project and Tea Party member from Mars, Butler County, said Congress doesn't understand the level of anger among constituents.
Moore called the Obama administration "communist."
Many of the people in the room were familiar faces, Altmire said, and he knows a lot of people came to speak out.
"I do everything I can to hear from as many people as I can," he said.Additional Information:
4th DistrictIn the Valley, the 4th District includes: Aspinwall, Buffalo, Cheswick, Clinton, Fawn, Fox Chapel, Frazer, Harmar, Harrison, Indiana, Murrysville, Oakmont, Plum, Springdale, Springdale Township, West Deer and part of Brackenridge, East Deer and O'Hara. The district also includes parts of Mercer and Beaver counties and all of Lawrence County.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.