ShareThis Page

Search on for pair of Plum kayakers last seen on Kiski River

| Monday, March 21, 2011

Two kayakers from Plum were the subject of a search being conducted along the Kiski River last night and into this morning.

The identities of the missing kayakers — a man, 23, and a woman, 22 — were not being released late Sunday.

Mike Bash, Kiski Township Volunteer Fire Department assistant fire chief said that authorities were alerted by a brother of one of the missing kayakers. The brother became separated from them around 5 or 6 p.m.

The fire companies were called out shortly before 9 p.m.

Bash said there were at least 65 firefighters spread out along the river.

"We're spread out 8 miles," he said. "We've got boats down in Leechburg, and down in Avonmore."

Firefighters and fire trucks were lined across the Apollo Bridge, with spotlights aimed at the water and shoreline.

The trailhead of the Roaring Run Trail hiking trail served as the command center for the rescuers.

There had been no sign of the kayakers as of 11:30 p.m.

Searchers were being recalled so that state police could search from a helicopter.

After the air search was concluded, officials were to determine how long the effort would continue through the night.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.