Tarentum's costly Snoopy pool to be replaced by spray park
By Tom Yerace
Published: Monday, Oct. 3, 2011
The physical imprint that Snoopy, the lovable canine from the "Peanuts" comic strip, has on the borough is doomed.
The tot pool in the borough's Riverside Memorial Park, which is shaped like Snoopy, will be replaced by a spray park next spring, according to borough officials.
Allegheny County's redevelopment authority sealed the Snoopy pool's fate last week when it awarded a $75,000 grant to the borough to replace it with the spray park, according to Bill Rossey, borough manager.
"It should pretty much cover the cost, depending on how many spray items we will put in," Rossey said. "We got an estimate, and it looks like we could spend about half of that money for fixtures and the other half for the engineering and site preparation."
He said that after the borough engineer draws up the specifications, the project will be put out for bid and installation probably will occur in the spring.
"This is the latest thing, the upcoming thing in parks," said Barbara Magnetta, Tarentum Recreation Board chairwoman and wife of Mayor Carl Magnetta. "I don't know of anybody other than Deer Lakes that has this. Those kids out there are just engrossed with this.
"I think we are all excited about the change," she added. "We are all excited about having something new for the kids."
Magnetta said the plans she has seen are for a 3,400-square-foot spray park with 16 types of sprays, ranging from "the arch" to "water flowers" to the "water worm."
The Snoopy pool has been a popular feature of the park for about 30 years, but borough officials said there were reasons to make a change.
"Number one, it's cost," said Carl Magnetta. "You have the cost of the chemicals, you have the cost of the lifeguards, plus you have the cost of getting the water tested all the time. Every year the cost keeps going up and up."
He said he had been working on trying to secure funding and credited state Rep. Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont, and state Sen. Jim Brewster, D-McKeesport, for endorsing the project with the redevelopment authority.
"We just figured if we could get this, it would be good for the kids, it would be good for us because it will save money in the long run," he said. "I just think it will be a great addition to the park."
Rossey said the borough was spending about $10,000 a year just to keep the tot pool going. He said the pool only had about four to six inches of water in it but the borough had to meet county health department water quality standards.
"You've got little kids in diapers down there, so we have to test the water to make sure that we have enough chlorine in there," he said.
That meant having the water in the pool tested every hour, including over the weekends, which led to the borough paying 16 hours in overtime every weekend to the person doing the testing, Rossey said.
In addition, he said the pool was closed for cleaning once a week and it required the presence of lifeguards, who were becoming increasingly difficult to find.
With the spray park, none of that will be needed because there will be no standing pool of water. In fact, there will be no water running unless someone is in amongst the fixtures.
"It's all motion activated, all you have to do is open up the fence," Rossey said, adding that the park can be kept open from morning to night instead of the current 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekday hours.
Also, he said the surface will be rubberized to protect children so that if they fall, they are not falling on concrete.
"This is something that everyone thought would serve more people better," Rossey said. "We just feel that more people could take advantage of it if it's a spray park."
"Actually, I think it is going to be safer, in my opinion," Barbara Magnetta said. " It's going to be a fun thing."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.