ShareThis Page

Driver chokes to death on bag of dope

| Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2011

A New Kensington man who died after leading police on a brief chase early Sunday morning apparently choked to death in his vehicle.

Allegheny County police said Curtis D. Patterson, 40, was found in his vehicle about 2 a.m. Sunday. Patterson, who fled police about an hour earlier, tried to make a high-speed turn from Freeport Road in East Deer onto the Ninth Street Bridge, but his car struck one of the concrete approaches to the bridge, according to Tarentum police Chief Bill Vakulick.

Allegheny County police Lt. Andy Schurman said on Monday that Patterson's windpipe was found to be blocked with marijuana and a plastic bag that had contained the drug. Police surmise that Patterson tried to swallow the bag with the marijuana in it after police tried to stop his vehicle in Tarentum at about 1 a.m.

Patterson was pronounced dead shortly after 3 a.m. in Allegheny Valley Hospital, Harrison.

Tarentum police had stopped Patterson's car, but he fled the scene at high speed. Police chased him for about one block before calling off the chase.

"Local police had a very brief pursuit but ended it because it was at high speed and dangerous," Schurman said.

County police routinely took over the investigation because a death had occurred.

Court records show that Patterson was charged with selling drugs in West Mifflin and New Kensington. He served probation in each case.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.