Vandergrift woman charged with stealing newspapers
By Chuck Biedka
Published: Thursday, March 8, 2012,
A Vandergrift woman is accused of stealing bundles of newspapers to get coupons, police say.
Linda Altman, 58, of the 1300 block of Hancock Ave., was charged Wednesday by Allegheny Township police.
Police said she was seen taking the two bundles of 100 newspapers each from a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette collection point at the Crossroads Mini Storage along Weinels Crossroads at about 7:30 a.m. and then driving away in a white SUV.
Altman was pulled over while driving such a vehicle by a Lower Burrell police officer along Leechburg Road, said Allegheny Township police Chief John Fontaine.
"She said she took them to get coupons," he said. "I've heard of extreme couponing, but not like this."
Robert Walker, the adult newspaper carrier who was waiting for the bundles, said he's had this happen for quite a while, not only on Wednesday, Fontaine said.
"He said it has cost him about $2,700," the chief said.
Altman is charged with burglary, theft, criminal trespass and receiving stolen property only in connection with Wednesday's theft.
She was arraigned by Allegheny Township District Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec on $5,000 unsecured bond. A hearing was set for April 3.
Walker of East Vandergrift said delivering the newspapers is his primary source of income.
Walker said he delivers 425 papers on Sunday in the township, Vandergrift and Apollo.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.