ShareThis Page
Books

St. Vincent instructor nominated for book award

| Thursday, March 23, 2017, 2:18 p.m.
Author Clare Beams
Kristi Jan Hoover
Author Clare Beams
'We Show What We Have Learned' by Clare Beams
'We Show What We Have Learned' by Clare Beams

St. Vincent College instructor Clare Beams, of Edgewood, is a finalist for the 2017 Young Lions Fiction Award. Beams was nominated for her short-story collection “We Show What We Have Learned” (Lookout Books).

Beams teaches creative writing at St. Vincent College in Latrobe and the Pittsburgh Center for the Arts in Shadyside, Her short-story collection earned praise from Joyce Carol Oates, who compared Beams' work to Alice Munro and Shirley Jackson.

The Young Lions Fiction Award, established in 2001, is given to an American fiction writer 35 or younger each year. The award comes with a $10,000 cash prize, and will be selected by judges including Susan Minot, Amelia Gray and Salvatore Scibona.

The other nominees are: Brit Bennett, “The Mothers” (Riverhead); Kaitlyn Greenidge, “We Love You Charlie Freeman” (Algonquin); Nicole Dennis-Benn, “Here Comes the Sun” (Liveright); and Karan Mahajan, “The Association of Small Bombs” (Viking).

The winner will be announced June 1 at the Celeste Bartos Forum in New York.

Rege Behe is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me