‘The Nanny’ explores deadly mystery in English upper class | TribLIVE.com

‘The Nanny’ explores deadly mystery in English upper class

Mary Pickels
William Morrow via AP
English author Gilly Macmillan’s latest novel is "The Nanny."

Fans of Daphne du Maurier’s “Rebecca,” along with devotees of the “Downton Abbey” series, likely will enjoy English author Gilly Macmillan’s newest novel, “The Nanny.”

Inside a rambling mansion outside of London, Lady Virginia Holt, her daughter, Jo, and Jo’s young daughter, Ruby, share an uneasy existence.

Thirty years ago, Jo’s beloved nanny, Hannah, disappeared in the middle of the night. Jo, angry at the loss, later left home and settled in California. Her husband’s death, and her precarious financial situation, brings her back to her widowed mother and the family home.

Soon after the discovery of a skull in the property’s lake, Hannah — or is it? — reappears.

Matriarch Virginia Holt, long having assumed Hannah dead, and with good reason, is terrified.

Jo, who can’t remember the circumstances behind Hannah leaving, sees her as the solution to her child care needs and hires her on the spot.

Through flashbacks, readers learn more about Hannah’s younger years, and may soon suspect whose skull is in the lake.

Jo’s anger at her mother and refusal to doubt her nanny may put her entire family in danger.

There is a bit of a white-knuckle ride to get there, but the story ends with a satisfying twist.

Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-836-5401, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: AandE | Books
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.