Beyoncé goes viral with wicked glare at Warriors’ owner’s wife |
Celebrity News

Beyoncé goes viral with wicked glare at Warriors’ owner’s wife

Madasyn Czebiniak
Jay-Z and Beyonce watch Game 1 of an NBA basketball second-round playoff series between the Golden State Warriors and the New Orleans Pelicans in Oakland, Calif. on April 28, 2018.

Don’t lean over Queen Bey.

That seems to be the message everyone is spreading after a video showing a woman leaning over Beyoncé to talk to her husband Jay-Z went viral.

Was it really that deep?

The incident took place Wednesday as the couple sat beside Golden State Warriors owner Joe Lacob and his wife, Nicole Curran, at Game 3 of the NBA Finals, according to BuzzFeed.News.

Fans of the singer immediately took to Twitter to comment on the video captured by ESPN.

People also thought the video showed Beyoncé purposefully nudging Nicole out of the way at the end.

The comments weren’t just limited to Twitter.

In less than an hour, Bey fans had flooded Curran’s Instagram page with endless bee emoji comments, forcing her to disable them, BuzzFeed.News said.

There was even a rumor that Beyoncé had Curran removed from her seat because of the interaction, but that was quickly refuted.

To read more about the incident visit BuzzFeed.News.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: AandE | Celebrity News | Local
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.