Cardi B tries to trademark ‘okurrr’ but doesn’t get OK | TribLIVE.com
Celebrity News

Cardi B tries to trademark ‘okurrr’ but doesn’t get OK

1364532_web1_CardiBIHeart
AP file
Cardi B tried to patent her way of saying “OK.”

As far-fetched as it sounded to some, Cardi B really did try to trademark her purported signature phrase “okurrr.”

But the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office said, “oh no.”

According to CNN, the platinum-selling rapper’s attorney Doreen Small filed applications on behalf of Cardi B’s company, Washpoppin Inc. to trademark the popular catchphrase in March to use it on paper goods, such as cups and posters, and clothing, like T-shirts and undergarments.

The patent office refused to register that trademark because it is a “commonplace term, message, or expression widely used by a variety of sources that merely conveys an ordinary, familiar, well-recognized concept or sentiment.”

They also noted how the expression is “commonly used in the drag community and by celebrities as an alternate way of saying ‘OK’ or ‘something that is said to affirm when someone is being put in their place.’”

When she hosted “The Tonight Show,” last year, the Grammy Award winner said it was like saying “OK” in a new way since “OK is played out.”

“You know, it’s like a cold pigeon in New York City,” Cardi B said, explaining there are different variations of the phrase depending on the situation.

The “Press” lyricist used the phrase during her Pepsi commercial, which premiered during the Super Bowl earlier this year.

Categories: AandE | Celebrity News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.