Kelly McGillis: ‘Old and fat’ reasons she’s not in ‘Top Gun’ sequel | TribLIVE.com
Movies/TV

Kelly McGillis: ‘Old and fat’ reasons she’s not in ‘Top Gun’ sequel

1481459_web1_ptr-KellyWeb-080119
AP
Kelly McGillis poses Jan. 18, 2013 for a portrait during the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah.

Unrealistic Hollywood beauty standards may be to blame for “Top Gun” star Kelly McGillis not being asked to appear in the upcoming sequel, the actress suggests.

She told “Entertainment Tonight” that those behind “Top Gun: Maverick,” due out next June, likely didn’t reach out to her because she’s “old and fat.”

“Oh my God, no,” McGillis, now 62, told ET of whether she was contacted for the film. “They did not and nor do I think they would ever. I mean, I’m old and I’m fat and I look age-appropriate for what my age is. And that is not what that whole scene is about.”

“I’d much rather feel absolutely secure in my skin and who and what I am at my age as opposed to placing a value on all that other stuff,” she added.

McGillis starred as an astrophysicist and the love interest of Tom Cruise’s character in “Top Gun,” the 1986 hit action drama about naval aviator Pete “Maverick” Mitchell (Cruise).

“Maverick” brings back Cruise, 57, but will see Jennifer Connelly, 48, step into the role of Maverick’s love interest.

McGillis says she hasn’t seen the trailer for the sequel yet, and isn’t sure if she’ll see the film. “It depends on what kind of reviews it gets,” she shared. “I’m not racing to the theater and I’m not racing away from the theater to see it. It’s just not on my little list of things that I would like to get done.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.