Passenger spies André 3000 playing flute at LAX terminal | TribLIVE.com
Music

Passenger spies André 3000 playing flute at LAX terminal

Samson X Horne
1298719_web1_Andre-3000
Rapper André 3000, one half of hip-hop duo Outkast, poses for a picture with Antonia Cereijido after she spotted him playing an indigenous flute on Friday, June 14, 2019.

It isn’t uncommon to see strangers playing instruments — the drums, a guitar, saxophone — in the most random of places.

But a celebrity doing so in the airport?

That may be a new one.

NPR Latino USA producer Antonia Cereijido was walking through Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) when she spotted a man playing a flute.

She suspected he was André 3000 from the iconic Atlanta hip-hop duo Outkast.

In a tweet, Cereijido said she thought she was “losing my mind” because the man she suspected was Andre 3000 had been walking around the terminal for 40 minutes playing the flute.

To her surprise, “it WAS André 3000!!!!” she wrote followed by heart-eyed smiley emojis and two crying emojis.

In all, the discovery isn’t too far-fetched, as André is known for his eccentric and carefree lifestyle.

According to CNN, Cereijido asked the rapper about his instrument, which he said was an indigenous double flute.

“Three Stacks” had no problem posing with Cereijido for a photo.

Then, the twoboarded the same flight to New York, CNN reported.

The post went viral quickly with 250,000 likes 35,000 retweets. It was the No. 1 trending topic on Twitter by Saturday morning.

Here’s a better view André 3000’s flute, captured by traveler Fernando Tomas Lauer.

View this post on Instagram

Met andré 3000 im hyped lol #la #airport #pdx #lax

A post shared by Nandolauer (@nandolauer) on

Samson X Horne is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Samson at 412-320-7845, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: AandE | Celebrity News | Music
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.