ShareThis Page
Post-interview, R. Kelly gets tried in the court of public opinion | TribLIVE.com
Music

Post-interview, R. Kelly gets tried in the court of public opinion

Shirley McMarlin
| Wednesday, March 6, 2019 10:14 a.m

“How stupid would I be to do that?”

In an interview with Gayle King of “CBS This Morning,” R. Kelly asked the question others have been asking since the R&B singer was charged with sexually abusing four people, including three underage girls.

In a performance of Shakespearean proportions, Kelly alternately shouted, cried, waved his arms and stood menacingly over King.

Though Kelly called all of his accusers liars, the court of public opinion stands with them. For the most part, reactions to his claims of innocence and persecution have been brutal.

Conversely, King gets mad props for keeping her professional cool in the midst of Kelly’s ranting.

Kelly isn’t without supporters, though they seem to be few and far between.

In January, Lifetime aired the documentary, “Surviving R. Kelly,” which explored allegations of sexual misconduct against the star.

Stories go back to the 1990s at the start of his career, many involving predatory behavior toward teenage girls.

In 2008, Kelly was acquitted on charges of having had sex with a 13-year-old. He’s currently charged with 10 counts of felony aggravated criminal sex abuse.

One more thing: Kelly married singer Aaliyah in 1994 when she was 15 — and he was 27.

Shirley McMarlin is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Shirley at 724-836-5750, smcmarlin@tribweb.com or via Twitter .


841539_web1_gtr-liv-rkellyreaction-030619
Tyler LaRiviere/Chicago Sun-Times/AP
R. Kelly walks to his vehicle after exiting BIGGS Mansion, a cigar lounge in Chicago’s Gold Coast on Feb. 25, 2019.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.