ShareThis Page
Celebrity News

James Franco accusers detail misconduct allegations on 'GMA'

| Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2018, 12:18 p.m.
Actor James Franco
Getty Images for Turner Image
Actor James Franco

NEW YORK — Two women who have accused actor James Franco of sexual misconduct said on ABC's "Good Morning America" on Tuesday that they're waiting for him to make amends.

Violet Paley and Sarah Tither-Kaplan repeated accusations they've made on Twitter that Franco abused his power and behaved inappropriately.

Paley has accused Franco of coercing her into performing oral sex on him. "He kind of like pushed my head down and was like, saying, 'come on,'" she said Tuesday.

Asked what she'd like Franco to do now, Paley said, "a lot of things but please just apologize."

Tither-Kaplan said she was a student in a master class on sex scenes taught by Franco and a lot of scenes "seemed gratuitous and exploitative." She added that Franco "created exploitative environments for non-celebrity women on his sets."

Tither-Kaplan said she'd like to see Franco use his power to "give opportunities to women that are real and valuable and actually give them career advancement."

The two women initially made their allegations on social media after Franco attended the Golden Globes awards ceremony wearing a "Time's Up" pin indicating support for victims of sexual misconduct.

Franco's representative made no comment except to say the women's claims are not accurate. They referred to his previous comment on the matter.

On "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," Franco said: "If I've done something wrong, I will fix it. I have to."

She said Franco exploited the "non-celebrity women" he worked with.

Franco's representative made no comment except to say the women's claims are not accurate. Franco said earlier: "If I've done something wrong, I will fix it."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me