ShareThis Page
Celebrity News

Rose McGowan indicted by Va. grand jury on felony cocaine possession

| Monday, June 11, 2018, 11:00 p.m.
Actress Rose McGowan speaks Oct. 27, 2017 at the inaugural Women's Convention in Detroit.
Paul Sancya | AP
Actress Rose McGowan speaks Oct. 27, 2017 at the inaugural Women's Convention in Detroit.

Actress Rose McGowan was indicted on a felony charge of possession of a controlled substance Monday by a Virginia grand jury, court documents confirm.

WTOP reported that McGowan, who last appeared at a probable-cause hearing in May, was not present in the courtroom in Loudon County, located about an hour northwest of Washington, and will not be there Tuesday when her trial date is set.

In November, the actress-turned-activist pled not guilty after cocaine was found in a wallet belonging to her that was left behind on her January 2017 flight to Washington for the Women's March.

However, her arrest warrant didn't come to light for another nine months — and not until after the publication of two bombshell reports detailing decades of sexual misconduct by disgraced movie Harvey Weinstein, whom McGowan has accused of raping her.

The timing led McGowan's lawyers to suggest the drugs may have been planted by agents hired by Weinstein to discredit her for making sexual assault accusations against him. Days before her Nov. 14 arraignment in Loudon County, Va., The New Yorker published a story by Ronan Farrow detailing how Weinstein employed former Israeli intelligence officers to keep tabs on his accusers and the journalists who might be talking to them.

Weinstein, who was charged last month with rape and a criminal sex act against two other women, has consistently denied he had non-consensual relations with any of his accusers. However, he settled a lawsuit with McGowan in 1997.

Jim Hundley, McGowan's lead attorney in the Virginia case, did not immediately respond to USA Today's request for comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me