ShareThis Page
More A and E

Author John Edgar Wideman consumed by tragic tales of the Tills

| Friday, Nov. 10, 2017, 12:48 p.m.
John Edgar Wideman
Emmai Alaquiva
John Edgar Wideman

The story of Emmett Till, a 14-year-old black teenager lynched by two white men in Mississippi in 1955, is one of the darker episodes of American history. Forgotten is the story of his father, Louis Till, a soldier who was executed during World War II after being convicted of rape.

When the men acquitted of Emmett Till's murder were charged with kidnapping, the charges were eventually dismissed because of Louis Till's conviction. When Pittsburgh native and writer John Edgar Wideman, author “Writing to Save a Life: The Louis Till” (Simon & Schuster), obtained a file about the father's case through the Freedom of Information Act, he found numerous inconsistencies that cast doubt on Louis Till's guilt.

“I can't say for sure,” Wideman says when asked if he thinks Louis Till was guilty. “But I do know he never had a chance. He was convicted because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time, and therein lies the problem. Because what happened to him has happened to many, many people.”

Wideman will appear Nov. 14 at Carnegie Lecture Hall in Oakland as a guest of the University of Pittsburgh's Humanities Center.

The award-winning author of books including “Brothers and Keepers,” “Sent for You Yesterday” and “Hoop Roots,” Wideman was born the same year as Emmett Till. When the news of Till's death reached Copeland Street in the Homewood section of Pittsburgh, where Wideman grew up, it was disheartening but not surprising to a black 14-year-old boy.

“He represented a kind of an insight into the underground way that the country operated,” Wideman says of Emmett Till. “On the surface it was a country where everybody was equal, blah, blah, blah, but there was an underground truth about white supremacy and young black men and the way those young black men were presented. And all of us were — certainly a lot of us in the African-American community — were aware of that. But we didn't talk about it because there was no point. We knew it and parents warned their young men, and their young women for different reasons, but there wasn't public discourse.”

When Wideman obtained the copy of United States v. Louis Till, he initially resisted reading it. More than 200 pages, the file was printed on paper of an “unnameable” color, haphazardly organized, both chronologically and by way of its page numbers. But he soon immersed himself in the contents, reading and re-reading it numerous times.

The file, Wideman writes, is a compendium of “frustrating discontinuities, helter-skelter chronology, bits and pieces of handwritten military dispatches and typed correspondence tossed in with no apparent rhyme or reason … pages missing, pages playing hide-and-seek. … I'm diminished by what I've learned.”

But Wideman has no regrets.

“(The file) has turned into something that has a tremendous life in my life now,” he says. “A tremendous presence. And it doesn't stop like any interesting, good story. It's never over.”

Wideman continues to hear from people who have “a stake in the story” through connections to the Tills, either metaphorically or personally. While he has found no answers or a definitive truth, Wideman has shed light on an incident that was buried and forgotten, like Louis Till's grave in a remote section of the Oise-Aisne American Cemetery in France.

“You launch into this mess and it just keeps getting grimier and grimier,” Wideman says. “One hopes that there is a purpose for it. One hopes that as a writer I can find some material that will make the whole effort worthwhile.”

Rege Behe is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me