ShareThis Page
More A and E

Ex-etiquette: Divorce is understandable for reasons of health, safety and fidelity

| Sunday, Dec. 1, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Question: My friend and I read your column, and we recently have had a disagreement.

She feels because you have been divorced, you have no right to give readers advice about maintaining a relationship. I feel because you have been divorced, you might give even better advice than someone who has never been through a breakup. So, for the record, is there any time you would say leaving someone is warranted?

Answer: Sounds to me like your friend isn't taking into consideration why someone might divorce and regards all divorce as frivolous. Truth is, there are definitely reasons that make a breakup understandable — and in the best interest of the children, if there are children to be considered.

Before we get started, let me first say that this column is about ex-etiquette or “good behavior after divorce or separation.” I started writing it 20 years ago in an effort to help those dealing with the trials of divorce and remarriage. It seemed that joint custody had changed all the rules, and people were having trouble navigating the waters. I saw mediation work firsthand and became a child-custody mediator as a result. Until then, I thought you break up, you make each other's life miserable. That was the nature of the beast. I developed the 10 rules of good ex-etiquette to help prevent that misery.

That said, divorce should not be a frivolous decision, especially if there are children involved. It all boils down to your safety, your partner's safety, and the safety of your children — and I will support anyone who chooses to leave if they face one of the following:

• Domestic violence or abuse of any sort. Leaving may be a matter of life and death. It is a parent's responsibility to keep their children safe, and if the other parent is hurting them or the children, leaving the relationship is certainly understandable.

• Your partner is abusing drugs and/or alcohol on a regular basis and is not in recovery. When under the influence, decisions may be questionable, and it has been my experience that's when violence often comes into play. Lying is commonplace. Once again, in cases like this, leaving may be more about survival than keeping the relationship together.

• Your partner has been diagnosed with a mental illness and is not following their doctor's orders, and/or is not med-compliant. Notice the qualification here: Not all mental-health diagnoses require medication, and there are those with such a diagnosis who are fabulous partners and parents. However, when those who are prescribed medication designed to help prevent psychosis or behaviors that may harm family members, stop taking that medication and become irrational or unpredictable and dangerous, again, separation is understandable.

• If a partner is unfaithful, divorce is certainly warranted. Some couples can overcome it. Some have told me their marriage is actually better now that they have faced it. That has not been my experience, but I will certainly support someone who chooses to stay — and understand why someone chooses to leave.

Tell your friend to write me if she disagrees.

Dr. Jann Blackstone is the author of “Ex-etiquette for Parents: Good Behavior After Divorce or Separation,” and the founder of Bonus Families, www.bonusfamilies.com. Reach her at drjannblackstone@gmail.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me