Company offers $1,300 to fan willing to watch 13 Stephen King movies | TribLIVE.com
Movies/TV

Company offers $1,300 to fan willing to watch 13 Stephen King movies

Chris Pastrick
1690192_web1_gtr-liv-films-121318
Warner Bros.
Are you for watching Jack Nicholson in “The Shining,” along with 12 other movies based on Stephen King novels? You could make some good coin.

Think you can you endure 13 classic films from master horror teller Stephen King?

Perhaps $1,300 would make you a little less afraid.

With Halloween approaching and two new King-inspired films hitting theaters (“It: Chapter 2” and “Doctor Sleep”), retailer USDish is throwing down the gauntlet (and putting up the cash) to find one viewer willing to sit through 13 movies based on King’s most chilling novels.

Stephen-King-Illustration-OPTION2-1

The winner will have until Halloween night to watch all 13. Which movies will they have have to sit through?

“Carrie” (original or 2013 remake, your pick)
“Children of the Corn”
“Christine”
“Creepshow”
“Cujo”
“Dreamcatcher”
“It” (original or 2017 remake)
“The Mist”
“Pet Sematary” (original or 2019 remake)
“Salem’s Lot”
“The Shining”
“Thinner”
“Misery”

Not only do you get the money, but the mission comes with a “Stephen King survival kit,” which includes a flashlight, blanket, movie-watching snacks, an Amazon gift card, and a FitBit — you know, to track how high you move on those jump scares.

The person selected will be required to take notes — most likely through social media — on how the movies are affecting them.

Applicants don’t need to pass a drug test or a background check, but they do have to be 18 years old and a U.S. citizen or permanent resident.

The deadline to apply is Oct. 15.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: AandE | Movies TV
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.